Wednesday, December 30, 2009

D-Flamvell

Today's netdecking article is D-flamvell , and as the name reads, its destiny and flamvell. We all know the potential of Flamvell magician that is a lvl4 and smaller than 1500 (so he wont get bottomlessed) and rekindling in a synchro deck.

I got this deck from my friend's blog "mystic tomato" post which can be found here and you can find the blog in my blog links. Seriously, it has some awesome potential. Alot of players don't really know this blog (I'm referring to Malaysian/ Singaporean/ any sort of Asians). Originally, its Norman Wilde's deck which won some event there in Germany.

It functions sort of like your old classic tele-DAD (redefined and improved of course!) and can suddenly come up with some unpredicted and surprising, yet annoying plays.


Here's the decklist..
3x Destiny Hero - Defender
2x Destiny Hero - Malicious
2x Cyber Valley
2x Flamvell Magician
2x Mystic Tomato
1x Elemental Hero Stratos
1x Summoner Monk
1x Plaguespreader Zombie
1x Flamvell Firedog
1x Dark Armed Dragon
1x Sangan
3x Destiny Draw
2x Allure of Darkness
1x Heavy Storm
1x Mind Control
1x Brain Control
1x Gold Sarcophagus
1x Lightning Vortex
1x Rekindling
1x Reinforcement of the Army
3x Skill Drain
2x Bottomless Trap Hole
1x Mirror Force
1x Torrential Tribute
1x Trap Dustshoot
1x Phoenix Wing Wind Blast
1x Solemn Judgment
1x Trap Stun
This is the type of deck that I would like to play. Its so fun and creative and most importantly, its unpredictable. Most cards aren't run in multiples unless needed such as the draw engine and some staples.
This could be the new Tele-DAD, my friends.
Time to go watch Sherlock Holmes (the new one lah). I'll sign off here, and tomorrow I'll post a different variant of D.D Eatos that I was playtesting in KL. It has its pros and cons. And some of you might like it better than the old one? Maybe? Some of you may not. Stay tuned loh.
Oh yeah, a happy new year to all you guys!! I'll probably be out whole night and yeah 2010 is gonna be a great year for Yu-Gi-Oh!

No comments: